- The Skinny on Wall Street
- Posts
- The Skinny On...
The Skinny On...
Pledge Allegiance | Which Flag?
This Week on The Floor
Why is Colombia issuing government debt denominated in Swiss Francs? Can this be a solution for the U.S.’ debt burden?
Shots fired in the latest battle of the Wall Street talent wars! What should you do about recruiting for your next job?
Markets Recap / Deal News
Interviewing this week? Here’s some content for your conversation.
Colombia’s Swiss Franc Bet:
What are “eurobonds”, and could they be a solution to the U.S. debt woes?
Jen here — I’m currently in Switzerland, and so naturally my interest was piqued when I saw unusual headlines about a new CHF-denominated bond issuance from….Colombia?!?
With its debt costs spiraling out of control, Colombia is making an unusual move: borrowing up to 10bn in Swiss francs to repurchase higher-cost debt denominated in Colombian pesos and U.S. dollars.
Why?
In (so far unsuccessful) attempts to cool off their currency, the Swiss central bank has cut interest rates all the way back down to 0.00%.
Colombia is borrowing money at a zero percent interest rate in a foreign currency to pay back money it borrowed in its native currency and in U.S. dollars at much higher interest rates. Colombia’s current 2 year government bonds are yielding around 9.60%, by comparison.
Per Bloomberg, the radical debt management strategy comes “after the administration of President Gustavo Petro suspended the nation’s fiscal rule for the next three years as it tries to avoid painful spending cuts. The announcement was swiftly followed by downgrades by both Moody’s and S&P last month.”
This type of maneuver — raising debt in a low-interest foreign currency to repurchase more expensive obligations — is a classic use case for something called “eurobonds”.
“Eurobonds” are government debt issued in a currency other than that of the issuer’s home country.
They can potentially allow one country to take advantage of a significant interest rate differential in another. More commonly, they are a key tool for emerging market issuers to access cheaper or more liquid pools of capital relative to the existing demand for their debt.
To be clear, the name “eurobond” is a historical artifact; these bonds don’t need to be denominated in euros or issued in Europe. In this case though, Colombia is also preparing to issue Euro-denominated bonds to further diversify its debt base.
But while this strategy can offer short-term interest savings and currency diversification, it comes with increased exchange rate risk and refinancing challenges — especially when loans are short-term, as is the case here.
So naturally this begs the question: could a highly indebted country like the U.S. ever use the same playbook?
Why don’t we just borrow a bunch of money at 0.00% in CHF or JPY to reduce our debt servicing costs? Hell, why don’t we just refinance all our outstanding $36tr worth of debt in those currencies?
Well, this strategy comes with major potential downside.
Eurobonds come at a cost: the issuer must repay that debt in the foreign currency, which introduces a layer of FX risk. If the local currency depreciates, the cost of servicing that debt rises in local terms.
The U.S. borrows almost exclusively in its own currency for good reason. Unlike Colombia or other emerging markets, the U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency, and U.S. Treasury securities are among the most liquid, low-risk, and relatively desirable financial instruments for inventors to own globally.
This gives the U.S. the rare ability to borrow cheaply, in large amounts, and with zero FX risk. Were the U.S. to issue debt in foreign currencies with lower interest rates like CHF or JPY, it would be exposing itself to the same risks that Colombia is now taking on, which include:
Exchange rate volatility: if the dollar weakens, the cost of servicing CHF- or JPY-denominated debt would rise sharply
Loss of monetary sovereignty: U.S. Treasuries are considered free of default risk because we can theoretically print money to pay back our debt. The U.S. would not be able to “print” Swiss francs or Japanese yen in a crisis.
Further loss of market confidence: think things are bad because investors are concerned about U.S. fiscal discipline now? A shift away from dollar-denominated debt could completely undermine global trust in the dollar’s role as the anchor of the international financial system.
More broadly, such a move could erode the so-called “exorbitant privilege” the U.S. enjoys of issuing debt in a currency the world demands. Giving that up to chase lower interest rates would be strategically short-sighted.
What Colombia is doing is a form of tactical debt optimization: buying back discounted bonds, lowering interest expenses, and diversifying its exposure. For an emerging market with limited fiscal space, it may make sense…at least, for now.
For the U.S. though, the solution to our mounting debt levels isn’t eurobonds. It’s fiscal discipline and economic growth. In fact, the ability to issue debt in one’s own currency is the very thing that allows countries to avoid debt traps, provided they manage that privilege responsibly. That means maintaining investor confidence, political stability, and credible long-term fiscal policy. It’s not exciting, but it’s sustainable.
Colombia’s eurobond strategy is an aggressive form of financial engineering that can work for countries with less demand for their debt, and who aren’t the global reserve currency. It is also a short-term solution that doesn’t promise a long term answer.
And for the U.S., the answer to our fiscal problems lies at home.
Turn Your Internship into a Full Time Offer
When I was a summer intern, I remember the introductory training session was like drinking through a firehose. Trying to figure out how to apply those concepts on the desk was confusing, and I struggled to make the connections.
If you’re like me and want a companion resource that you can learn from on your own time, that will stick with you through your internship, your full time recruiting, and your early months on the desk, we’ve got you covered.
Our best in class self-paced Investment Banking and Private Equity Fundamentals course is available for those of you who want to make sure you not only get the offer, but also rank at the top of your class once you’re on the desk.
Loyalty Oaths vs. Leveling Up
Shots fired in the latest battle of the great Wall Street talent war…
As reported by Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs will now require junior analysts to certify every three months that they haven’t accepted or informally committed to jobs elsewhere. What they’re really concerned about are Private Equity firms.
This policy is aimed at curbing the aggressive “on-cycle” recruiting process, where buy side firms frequently approach analysts before they’ve even completed training for their first job at an Investment Bank.
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has called the practice “unethical,” noting it puts young bankers in a “conflicted position”, and last month implemented a rule that analysts who accepted another job offer within their first 18 months of employment might find themselves out of a job.
Private Equity mega funds Apollo Global Management, General Atlantic, and TPG have now mirrored this stance, announcing they will not interview or extend offers this year to undergrads for jobs starting in 2027.
Our DMs are flooded with questions from concerned candidates who don’t know how to navigate this shifting landscape. As we very vocally argued when JPMorgan’s internal memo was leaked, young talent is once again caught in the crossfire. The apparent premise behind these policies, in the words of T.F. Hodge, is that “one owes loyalty, only, to those who demonstrate it in kind”.
But these are firms that notoriously overhire and overfire junior staff. Many simply don’t have spots available for many of their analysts to stay on as associates. For many young candidates, the message they’re hearing is, “we don’t guarantee you a long term spot here, but you’re out of a job if you commit to another role elsewhere for the future”.
So if you’re currently a summer intern or incoming full time analyst, what should you do to maximize your career potential in this evolving environment?
If you’re currently employed by an investment bank (whether as an intern or new hire analyst), our advice is as follows:
First, your top priority should be excelling on the job. Demonstrating a mastery of the technical skills, a proactive attitude, and intellectual curiosity remain the most effective ways to secure a return offer or valuable references. Even if you ultimately plan to pursue roles outside the firm, your credibility and track record with your current desk will follow you wherever you go. Careers are long, and you should never burn bridges just because you think you are destined for bigger and better things.
Focus on building relationships internally. Connecting with your peers, mentors, and managers doesn’t just benefit your current role, but may also help open more doors for you down the line.
It’s not illegal to build your network. Balancing your work responsibilities with informal recruiting is not only possible, but a natural part of your career progression. Reallocate the time you might have otherwise devoted to on-cycle recruiting to coffee chats, network outreach, interview prep, and relationship building. Shift to a more organic connection lifecycle, where not every conversation is held with an immediate recruiting goal in mind, and you may just build stronger relationships.
Never sacrifice your integrity. When phrases like “loyalty oaths” are being tossed around, it’s important to remember the words of Benjamin Franklin: “it takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to lose it.” In this climate, integrity, judgment, and timing are under the spotlight. Approach recruiting with discretion, focus on your current responsibilities, and let your performance open the right doors…at the right time.