- The Skinny on Wall Street
- Posts
- The Skinny On...
The Skinny On...
Tax Bill | Bad Press
This Week on The Floor
Quick update from your besties at TWSS:
For all of you about to start your new job or summer internship, we’ve got a special gift!
We are hosting a FREE LIVE 1-HOUR MASTERCLASS next week.
The topic? Excel and Financial Modeling Essentials.
New to Excel? Or just want to dial up your skills to feel confident using Excel in a professional setting? This class is your secret weapon. And it’s FREE.
Can’t make it live? Register in order to access the 48-hour free replay.
Excited to see you all!!
The “big beautiful tax bill” just passed the house. Breaking down the details for you.
Answering your questions: does bad PR for an investment bank lead to a drop in deal flow?
Markets Recap / Deal News
Interviewing this week? Here’s some content for your conversation.
Trump’s Tax Bill: What’s In It, How It Could Pass, and Why It Matters for Markets
Last week on The Wall Street Skinny, we sat down with Congressman Seth Magaziner to dissect the tax proposal that just passed the house by one vote — and the structural debt risks that aren’t getting enough airtime.
Here’s a breakdown of what you need to know.
What’s Actually in the Tax Bill?
The bill currently being advanced by House Republicans includes:
$5 trillion in new tax cuts over the next 10 years
$2 trillion in proposed spending cuts
Net increase in U.S. debt by $3–5 trillion, depending on economic assumptions
Key provisions:
Extension of the 2017 Trump tax cuts, including:
Lowered top individual tax rates (e.g., 37% vs. 39.6%)
A higher standard deduction
The 21% flat corporate tax rate remains in place (which was dropped from a progressive 35% in 2017)
Plus…
Estate tax exemption increase from ~$14mm (which was scheduled to drop down to $7mm with the expiry of prior tax cuts) to $15mm per person / $30mm per couple
Raising the $10,000 SALT deduction cap to $40,000 for individuals and joint filers starting this year, with a phase-out for those making >$500,000 per year. The cap would increase by 1% per year for ten years.
Private Universities with large endowments will be subject to a 21% tax on investment income, up from 1.4%.
Temporary exemption of taxes on tips and overtime work.
Spending cuts target:
Medicaid: reduced federal match to states → likely state tax hikes or coverage losses
SNAP (food stamps): states now required to cover 25% of the program cost
How Can This Pass? (Reconciliation 101)
Normally, any bill that increases the federal deficit needs 60 votes in the Senate to pass. But under a budget maneuver called reconciliation, a bill can pass with just 51 votes — if it doesn’t increase the deficit over a 10-year window.
The loophole: Congressional Republicans argued that the 2017 tax cuts were already the baseline, even though those tax cuts were set to expire and REQUIRE a new bill to make them permanent. The argument is that making them “permanent” doesn’t technically increase the deficit.
Whether this math holds depends on the Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan official who rules on procedural questions. If she disagrees, the bill would be ineligible for reconciliation — and likely fail in the Senate — unless she were to be deposed or replaced by someone who would bless the bill.
What About the Debt Ceiling?
The U.S. is projected to hit its debt ceiling in July. The debt ceiling doesn’t authorize new spending — it authorizes the Treasury to pay for spending already approved by Congress.
If it isn’t raised:
The U.S. could default on its obligations for the first time ever
That could rattle credit markets and undermine the global perception of Treasury securities as “risk-free”
Over the past week, we’ve seen Moody’s downgrade the U.S.’ credit rating, and long-dated Treasuries have sold off back to April levels on investors’ lack of confidence in the U.S.’ fiscal discipline.
The Debt Projections Are Built on Shaky Assumptions
Even if you accept the $3–5 trillion increase in debt at face value…that number may be overly optimistic. Here’s why:
The Congressional Budget Office’s projections assume 2.6% GDP growth annually
But the Fed’s forecast is just 1.7–1.8% for the next few years, suggesting these tax revenue expectations may be overly optimistic
Many of the spending cuts are back-loaded — meaning they don’t kick in for years and could be reversed
For example, Medicaid cuts are delayed, leaving open the possibility of political pushback before implementation
The tax cuts, however, kick in immediately — creating a mismatch between the “spend” and the “pay for”.
The proposal doesn’t fully account for the potential impact of new tariffs, which could:
Hurt consumer demand
Slow GDP growth
Trigger inflation and raise borrowing costs further
This leads to a broader concern: what happens if GDP doesn’t meet expectations?
Slower growth = lower tax revenue = larger deficits. That in turn raises the risk of entering a debt trap, where we must borrow simply to cover interest payments
According to projections, the U.S. could soon spend $2 trillion/year on interest expense alone
Bottom Line for Investors
US debt is now at ~120% of GDP, and this bill could take us to ~130% — an all-time high.
Higher debt + higher rates = higher risk premiums
The market hasn’t fully priced in these risks yet — but watch:
Reconciliation decisions
Debt ceiling negotiations
Bond yields and Fed response
This episode was packed with insights — and we barely scratched the surface. For the full discussion on taxes, policy, and the economics behind the headlines, watch here!
Free Resource: Financial Institution Growth Guide
There’s still time to download “The Financial Institution’s Guide to Growth with HubSpot.” It’s completely free.
This valuable guide explores how leading banks, credit unions, and fintech firms are adapting to industry challenges and accelerating growth using HubSpot’s powerful customer platform.
Learn how to build deeper trust, deliver better customer experiences, and generate measurable ROI through actionable strategies proven by financial services leaders.
Get your copy of “The Financial Institution’s Guide to Growth with HubSpot” and start turning today’s challenges into tomorrow’s wins.
Bad Press = Bad Bonuses?
A member of our social media community recently asked us about banks that have had some seriously bad headlines.
“Do these impact the firm’s deal flow? And, if so, how badly?”
Some have speculated that negative press will spark cries of outrage, scare away clients, and lead corporate clients to stop hiring investment banks with reportedly poor working conditions.
Our take?
It’s not so simple.
At the end of the day, companies are beholden to their shareholders. Clients want what is best for THEM. And when hiring a corporate advisory team, the client mostly just cares about THEIR bottom line. So if there’s nothing illegal going on, clients rarely change their behavior off of qualms over how a service provider is treating their employees.
They’ll hire whoever gives them the best outcome.
Moreover, while we believe that culture does start at the top, investment banks are large institutions. Within all the different banks where we worked, there was dramatic variation in the lifestyle, culture, and hours worked from group to group and desk to desk. Good or bad work culture can be hyperlocal and confined to individual groups, or perhaps even single department heads, Managing Directors, or staffers.
Just because one group is behaving badly doesn’t mean that the whole firm is rotten.
Instead, the real impact of articles like these is they lead incoming talent to reconsider joining particular firms.
If you’re the world’s best candidate choosing between offers from two elite institutions, and firm A has bad press about how it treats its analysts, you’ll likely choose firm B.
If that selection process happens consistently enough that the overall talent pool becomes depleted, leading to inferior production, THEN the bank may then see a decrease in fees.
But the scary truth is that these roles are so competitive, firms could fill their analyst classes multiple times over with highly qualified candidates. Even their second, third, and fourth choice candidates in recruiting are likely incredibly talented. With such a deep bench to choose from, most firms have not been meaningfully held to task for bad behavior.
Which is unfortunately why we continue to see these types of articles.
If you’ve been offered a role at a firm with some bad PR, do your homework on the individual groups. See if you can talk to junior bankers and get their honest take.
Even better? Talk to bankers who have recently left and ask them what their experience was like. The more concrete data points you can get from trusted sources, the better equipped you’ll be to make the right decision for yourself.